Titanium Comparison Table vs. Other Metals
For an intuitive snapshot of how titanium performs versus other metals, here’s a table comparing the most popular jewellery metals against various sustainability metrics. The scoring goes from 1 (bad) to 5 (great).
Note that this table should only be used for general guidance only, but it’s helpful in providing an easy and simple way to explore the metals fitness for an environmentally friendly world.
Sustainability Criteria | Titanium | Gold | Silver | Stainless Steel | Tungsten |
Energy Consumption in Extraction | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
Water Usage in Extraction | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
Chemical Use in Extraction/Processing | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
Landscape Disruption | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
Material Efficiency | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
Energy Consumption in Production | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
Durability and Lifecycle Impact | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Recyclability | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
Titanium ranks consistently higher across all criteria due to its energy-efficient extraction process, minimal water and chemical usage, low landscape disruption, excellent material efficiency, and superior durability and recyclability.
Gold and Silver are ranked lower in most categories due to their energy-intensive extraction processes, significant water and chemical usage, and substantial landscape disruption. Their durability is moderate, and while they are recyclable, the processes are complex due to alloying.
Stainless Steel shows decent performance in most criteria, with its energy consumption for production and landscape disruption being notable concerns. It has good material efficiency and recyclability.
Tungsten has moderate rankings across the board, with particular concerns regarding its energy-intensive production process, even though it has good durability.